From 000e6ad3dea9fe04759c7d27ea9ae500eccdc4bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: John Mark Bell Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 07:00:58 +0000 Subject: It turns out that realloc(ptr, 0) --> free(ptr) is not actually required by the C standard (whereas realloc(NULL, size) --> malloc(size) is). Therefore, explicitly model the behaviour expected by our libraries (that realloc of 0 size is equivalent to free). svn path=/trunk/netsurf/; revision=10524 --- css/css.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) (limited to 'css/css.c') diff --git a/css/css.c b/css/css.c index f051d52b9..7fb17519b 100644 --- a/css/css.c +++ b/css/css.c @@ -60,6 +60,11 @@ static nserror nscss_import(hlcache_handle *handle, */ static void *myrealloc(void *ptr, size_t size, void *pw) { + if (size == 0) { + free(ptr); + return NULL; + } + return realloc(ptr, size); } -- cgit v1.2.3